Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 116--122

Pulmonary hypertension and cardiac anesthesia: Anesthesiologist's perspective


Manjula Sudeep Sarkar, Pushkar M Desai 
 Department of Anesthesiology, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Manjula Sudeep Sarkar
101, Empire Building, Veera Desai Road, Andheri West, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

Perioperative management of pulmonary hypertension remains one of the most challenging scenarios during cardiac surgery. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality due to right ventricular failure, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, and intractable hypoxia. Therefore, this review article is intended toward the anesthetic considerations in the perioperative period, with particular emphasis on the selection of technique and choice of anesthesia with maintenance, anesthetic drugs, and the recent intraoperative recommendations for prevention and treatment of pulmonary hypertensive crisis.



How to cite this article:
Sarkar MS, Desai PM. Pulmonary hypertension and cardiac anesthesia: Anesthesiologist's perspective.Ann Card Anaesth 2018;21:116-122


How to cite this URL:
Sarkar MS, Desai PM. Pulmonary hypertension and cardiac anesthesia: Anesthesiologist's perspective. Ann Card Anaesth [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 19 ];21:116-122
Available from: https://www.annals.in/text.asp?2018/21/2/116/229911


Full Text



 Introduction



Cardiac anesthesiologists routinely encounter pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the perioperative period. Anesthesia administration in this subset of patients is a challenging task due to hyperreactive airway and risk of right ventricular (RV) failure. However, with the advent of innovative treatments and advanced hemodynamic monitoring, successful management of these patients is a reality nowadays. The functional status and life expectancy of patients with this condition have significantly increased; so, these patients are likely to encounter noncardiac surgical procedures too. The anesthetic management of such patients requires a thorough understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology, type, and severity of PH along with the nature of the surgical procedure.

 Definition



According to the Fourth World Symposium, PH is defined as “a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >25 mmHg at rest, and more than 30 mmHg during exercise; based on a review demonstrating that the normal mPAP is 14 mmHg.”[1] Borderline PH is mPAP between 20 and 24 mmHg.[2]

 Etiology and Classification



Recently, original Dana Point classification of PH has been updated [3] and encompasses numerous clinical conditions causing PH [Table 1]. Anesthesiologists usually deal with PH type 2 and 3 in the perioperative period.{Table 1}

 Pathophysiology



PH is a conglomeration of various interrelated processes resulting in endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling with excessive cell proliferation in the presence of reduced cell apoptosis, and thrombosis.

Group 1: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results from an excessive vasoconstriction due to abnormal function or expression of potassium channels in the smooth muscle cells and endothelial dysfunction leading to chronically impaired production of vasodilator and antiproliferative agents such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin, along with overexpression of vasoconstrictor and proliferative substances such as thromboxane A2 and endothelin-1 (ET-1).[3] ET-1 production, which is a potent vasoconstrictor and stimulates smooth muscle cell proliferation, is increased in the pulmonary vasculature.[4]

All forms of PH are believed to result in a state of reduced NO bioavailability which has vasodilatory and antiproliferative properties.[5] Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) expression is increased in the endothelial smooth muscle cells and right ventricle.[6]

Genetic cause includes mutation of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptor-2 which leads to loss of inhibitory action of BMP on vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells growth.[7] Ultimately, chronically elevated afterload results in hypertrophy and dilatation of the right ventricle, and a metabolic shift from oxidative mitochondrial metabolism to the glycolytic pathway, which is related to cardiac ischemia [8] and progressive right-sided heart failure with decreased cardiac output and the typical clinical symptoms occur [Table 2].[9],[10]{Table 2}

Group 2: PH due to left heart disease triggers “back pressure” effects in the pulmonary veins, and consequently, an elevation in pulmonary artery pressure occurs. This causes reactive changes in the pulmonary vascular bed, accompanied by vasoconstriction, remodeling, and increase in the transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG = mPAP − pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP]).[11] In these cases, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is within normal range.

Group 3: This involves hypoxic vasoconstriction, mechanical stress of hyperinflated lungs, loss of capillaries, inflammation, and toxic effects of smoking. There are also data supporting an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor–vasodilator imbalance.[3]

Group 4: PH occurs due to nonresolution of acute embolic masses that undergo fibrosis leading to mechanical obstruction of pulmonary arteries and pulmonary vascular remodeling results. Thrombophilic factors, such as antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, and elevated factor VIII, have been statistically associated with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and no abnormalities of fibrinolysis have been consistently demonstrated. Microvascular disease may be related to shear stress in nonobstructed areas, postcapillary remodeling related to bronchial-to-pulmonary venous shunting, inflammation and release of cytokines and vasculotrophic mediators.[3]

Group 5: Pathobiology is unclear or multifactorial.[3]

PH can also be categorized into pre- and post-capillary, and a distinction between two is fundamental in understanding the vascular and hemodynamic changes which are summarized in [Table 3].{Table 3}

 Treatment



Different treatment modalities as per class of PH are summarized below.[12]

Group 1: Anticoagulation, diuretics, oxygen therapy, and digoxin.

Therapeutic approach is guided by functional status (WHO symptom classification) and objective testing (e.g., 6-min walk test) as follows:

Low risk, functional Class I–III patients may be treated with oral PDE-5 inhibitors, oral endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), or inhaled prostacyclinsHigh risk, functional Class III–IV patients should be treated with intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous prostacyclins.

Group 2: They are managed with therapies for left heart failure. The use of pulmonary vasodilators may worsen pulmonary edema by increasing pulmonary blood flow in the presence of elevated left-sided filling pressures. However, few patients have developed intrinsic pulmonary vascular disease and benefit from pulmonary vasodilator therapy. A small trial suggested potential benefit of PDE-5 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction if there was a >5 mmHg difference between PA diastolic pressure and PCWP after optimizing volume and blood pressure.

ERAs and prostacyclins should not be used.

Group 3: Management is directed at the underlying lung disease. Pulmonary vasodilators do not have a role and worsens ventilation perfusion (VQ) matching in these patients.

Group 4: PH is potentially curable with pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. There may be a role for pulmonary vasodilators in those who are not surgical candidates.

Group 5: Management is directed at the underlying disease.

 Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension



The use of ERAs in PAH management is relatively new, and thus, bosentan, ambrisentan, and recently, macitentan have been approved for use.

Bosentan: It is a dual ERA, which competitively antagonizes the binding of endothelin to both endothelin receptors ETA and ETB. The initial oral dose for bosentan therapy is 62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks; further, it is increased to a maintenance dose of 125 mg twice daily. Common side effects include liver toxicity and major birth defects. Accordingly, baseline and periodic liver function tests and pregnancy tests are required. Dose adjustments are not required in renal insufficiency. It is a microsomal enzyme inducer and thus reduces the concentration of drugs like warfarin, sildenafil when administered together.[13]

Ambrisentan is a highly selective ETA receptor antagonist. Dose is 5–10 mg oral once daily. Unlike bosentan, ambrisentan has a low potential for drug interactions.[14]

Macitentan is a new potent nonpeptide nonselective ERA with a 50-fold higher affinity for ETA than for ETB receptors. Dose is 10 mg oral.[14]

Side effects of ERA are related to vasodilator properties such as headache, peripheral edema, nasal congestion, flushing, elevation in hepatic enzymes, peripheral edema, anemia, teratotoxicity, and male infertility.[13]

 Newer Drugs



Riociguat is a new class of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator. Guanylate cyclase is the intracellular receptor for NO, which has vasodilatory and antiproliferative effects on blood vessels, including the pulmonary arteries.

Recent PATENT 1 trial demonstrated improved exercise tolerance, hemodynamic parameters, and secondary outcomes with riociguat in people with PAH compared to placebo.[15]

Selexipag, an oral selective prostacyclin receptor agonist, has improved pharmacological properties and minimizes side effects associated with prostacyclin use. The dosing flexibility afforded by oral selexipag may facilitate achieving the maximum therapeutic effect with acceptable tolerability in patients with PAH.[16]

 Surgical Risk



PH is an independent predictor of increased morbidity and mortality (4%–24%) following surgery, and these patients are high-risk candidates depending on severity of disease and surgical procedure.[9]

The assessment of perioperative risk depends on the type of surgery, the severity of PH, and the functional status of the patient. The outcomes of major surgeries showed mortality and short-term morbidity rates of 7% and 42%, respectively. Perioperative risk factors which increase morbidity and mortality include New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade >2, 6-min walk distance <300 m, history of computer-aided diagnosis, pulmonary embolism apart from emergency nature of surgery, anesthesia duration exceeding 3 h, and use of vasopressors.[17]

 Preoperative Assessment



The preoperative evaluation of these patients includes assessment of functional state, severity of the disease, and type of surgery proposed. A detailed history of symptoms including dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, and syncope should be elicited. NYHA functional class predicts survival in these patients. Severity of disease is also suggested by symptoms of low cardiac output, including metabolic acidosis, hypoxia, and syncope which is a poor prognostic sign.[9]

The 6-min walking distance is used to assess exercise capacity, and a reduced total distance is associated with a higher mortality.[18]

Preoperative investigations include routine blood tests, chest radiography, electrocardiography, echocardiography, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including blood gas analysis, and right heart catheterization. Pro-brain natriuretic peptide level is an independent predictor for postoperative cardiac mortality in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.[19] Echocardiographic predictors of poor prognosis include right atrial enlargement surface >27 mm2, reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and pericardial effusion.[20] Echo also evaluates biventricular function, valvular structures, and any intracardiac shunts. However, mPAP is often underestimated on echo; therefore, right heart catheterization is preferred. It allows differentiation between pre- and post-capillary PH in addition to determining pulmonary vascular reactivity to vasodilators. ECG is done to evaluate signs of RV strain or ischemia. PFT becomes useful in Group 3 subset while spirometry provides important information for estimating the severity and progression of the disease.[2] PH medications including calcium channel blockers, digoxin, diuretics, prostaglandin infusion, and sildenafil should be continued till the day of surgery. Warfarin should be bridged to low molecular weight/unfractionated heparin before surgery.

 Monitoring



In addition to standard American Society of Anesthesiologists monitoring, invasive arterial blood pressure is required as hemodynamics can deteriorate rapidly in these patients. Temperature monitoring is must as hypothermia exaggerates PVR.[21] Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring with either pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) helps in guiding anesthetic management, particularly in high-risk procedures. However, placement of PAC may result in transient ventricular arrhythmias that can compromise RV filling. PA rupture [22],[23] is also more likely to occur in these patients, and the risks and benefits of this monitoring tool must be carefully weighed. TEE provides information about ventricular filling using left ventricular end-diastolic area in the transgastric short-axis view (normal values: 5.5-11.9 cm2/m2), pulmonary artery systolic pressure, tricuspid regurgitation and cardiac output estimation using continuous Doppler methods. It also helps in earliest detection of ventricular ischemia by identifying regional wall motion abnormalities.[24] TEE helps in optimization of intraoperative fluid therapy as well, and caused a significant change in therapeutic management in about 30% of patients.[25] It has the potential to offer a noninvasive, valid alternative to Swan–Ganz catheters in the hemodynamic assessment of patients in the perioperative period.[26] Central venous oxygen saturation monitoring can be used as a marker of global tissue perfusion.

 Choice of Anesthesia Technique



General anesthesia is preferred for all cardiac surgery patients in view of smooth induction and maintenance although few anesthesiologists prefer to administer regional anesthesia in selected cases.[27]

All standard anesthesia techniques can be used in these patients.[28] Advantages of regional anesthesia include maintenance of spontaneous breathing; thus avoiding elevation of pulmonary pressures, which is induced by mechanical ventilation.[29] Thoracic epidural anesthesia does not have any significant influence on oxygenation and PVR.[27] However, caution must be taken with regional anesthesia in patients with advanced stages of PH who cannot be subjected to the supine position for longer period of time. Furthermore, these patients receive anticoagulant medications and it should be given a due consideration.

General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation ensures adequate oxygenation and controlled ventilation, apart from the ability to administer selective pulmonary vasodilators. Nevertheless, anesthesia administration (including induction, maintenance, and emergence) may expose patients to physiological insults such as periods of apnea and hypoventilation, hypoxemia, fluctuations in body temperature, episodes of systemic hypotension, bursts of intense sympathetic stimulation arising from the unconscious experience of somatic pain, rapid fluid shifts and changes in cardiac preload, and mechanical ventilation.[30]

In addition, reduction in mean arterial pressure due to anesthetic agents-induced systemic vasodilation and positive pressure ventilation-induced elevation in PVR reduces coronary perfusion pressure to the right ventricle.[1]

All standard IV induction agents can be used in combination with opioids, as they did not influence PVR and oxygenation.[31],[32] Histamine-releasing relaxants (atracurium) should be avoided, as they may further increase pulmonary resistance.[1] Volatile anesthetic agents up to 1 minimum alveolar concentration can be given safely without any negative effect on pulmonary vasculature.[33],[34]

Authors prefer inhalational induction with sevoflurane in pediatric patients while combination of intravenous and inhalational induction for other patients.

 Perioperative Management



Anesthetic management is aimed to prevent PH crisis and subsequent RV failure and is summarized in [Table 4].{Table 4}

Recently, Pilkington et al. in their review postulated perioperative hemodynamic goals as to keep systolic blood pressure >90, mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg, mPAP <35, PVR/systemic vascular resistance ratio <0.5, and cardiac index >2.2 l/min/m2.

Management of a pulmonary hypertensive crisis is based on general principles of avoiding factors which further increases PVR and simultaneously maintain RV perfusion too.[35]

General principles

Avoid hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, hypercarbia, acidosis, hypothermia, and high airway pressuresReduce RV afterloadMaintain coronary blood flow and sinus rhythm.

Maintain cardiac output using

Vasopressors – noradrenaline; vasopressinInotropes – adrenaline; dobutamineInodilators – milrinone; enoximoneIntravenous vasodilators (caution if low systolic blood pressure)

Milrinone (25–50 mcg/kg bolus, followed by 0.5–0.75 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion) prostacyclin (4–10 ng/kg/min continuous infusion)Iloprost (1–3 ng/kg/min continuous infusion)Sildenafil (oral - 0.25–0.5 mg/kg every 4–8 h IV - 1.6 mg/kg/day)[36]

Dobutamine: 2–5 μg/kg/min continuouslyNitroglycerine: 2–10 μg/kg/min continuouslySodium nitroprusside: 0.2–0.3 μg/kg/min continuously

Selective pulmonary vasodilators

Iloprost (5–10 mg diluted in 10 ml saline, nebulized over 10 min, repeated every 2–4 h)Prostacyclin (25–50 mcg diluted in 50 ml saline, nebulized over 15 min, repeated every hour)NO (5–40 ppm continuously)Inhaled milrinone (2–5 mg) for 10–15 min (diluted in 10–15 ml of 0.9% NaCl)Inhaled epoprostenol (continuous) 10–50 ng/kg/min.

 Postoperative Management



Patients with PH have risk of developing pulmonary vasoconstriction, arrhythmias, pulmonary thromboembolism, and RV failure in the postoperative period and should be fully monitored in the intensive care unit. Systemic pressure should be maintained with judicious use of vasopressors and inotropes, along with replacement of blood volume if needed.

Adequate analgesia is provided with regional blocks and nonopioid medications. Arrhythmias should be treated with amiodarone as beta-blockers are poorly tolerated in these patients. In patients in whom sinus rhythm cannot be restored, digoxin should be considered for rate control. Vasodilator therapies must be continued and gradually switched over to preoperative regimen.[37]

 Pregnancy and Pulmonary Hypertension



Conventionally, pregnancy is to be avoided in severe PH and Eisenmenger syndrome. Recent systematic review revealed mortality rate around 17% in idiopathic PAH and 33% in PH associated with other conditions.[38]

Regarding medical management, ERAs are contraindicated during pregnancy due to their teratogenic effect, but epoprostenol, treprostinil, nebulized iloprost, sildenafil, and inhaled nitric oxide can be used.[39]

In general, elective cesarean section is preferred for delivery. However, maternal mortality is similar with both regional as well as general anesthesia (~20%).[40],[41] The majority of deaths in pregnant patients with PAH occur in the peripartum period, mainly due to right heart failure and pulmonary thromboembolism.

 Conclusion



PH and cardiac surgery are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and a reduction in quality of life. However, perioperative management has become more effective due to deeper understanding of the disease and newer therapeutic interventions. Advanced monitoring in the form of intraoperative TEE to assess biventricular dimensions and contractility, greatly facilitates the conduct of anesthesia. Nevertheless, selective pulmonary vasodilation by inhalation modality should be available intraoperatively, in addition to invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Continuous postoperative monitoring and adequate analgesia should be taken care of. Successful perioperative management of such patients requires a thorough assessment, careful planning, and multispecialty involvement of anesthesiologist, surgeon, cardiologists, and pulmonologists, which allow for the best possible outcomes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Pritts CD, Pearl RG. Anesthesia for patients with pulmonary hypertension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23:411-6.
2Galiè N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, Barbera JA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 2009;30:2493-537.
3Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2015;46:903-75.
4Dupuis J, Jasmin JF, Prié S, Cernacek P. Importance of local production of endothelin-1 and of the ET(B) Receptor in the regulation of pulmonary vascular tone. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2000;13:135-40.
5Bowers R, Cool C, Murphy RC, Tuder RM, Hopken MW, Flores SC, et al. Oxidative stress in severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:764-9.
6Archer SL, Weir EK, Wilkins MR. Basic science of pulmonary arterial hypertension for clinicians: New concepts and experimental therapies. Circulation 2010;121:2045-66.
7Machado RD, Eickelberg O, Elliott CG, Geraci MW, Hanaoka M, Loyd JE, et al. Genetics and genomics of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:S32-42.
8Piao L, Marsboom G, Archer SL. Mitochondrial metabolic adaptation in right ventricular hypertrophy and failure. J Mol Med (Berl) 2010;88:1011-20.
9Blaise G, Langleben D, Hubert B. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: Pathophysiology and anesthetic approach. Anesthesiology 2003;99:1415-32.
10Subramaniam K, Yared JP. Management of pulmonary hypertension in the operating room. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007;11:119-36.
11Morrell NW, Adnot S, Archer SL, Dupuis J, Jones PL, MacLean MR, et al. Cellular and molecular basis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:S20-31.
12Ley B. Pulmonary Hypertension Update/Review Part 1 of 2: Classification and Diagnosis. Available from: http://pulmccm.org/main/2013/review-articles/pulmonary-hypertension-update-part-1-classification-diagnosis-review-jama. [Last updated on 2013 Feb 05].
13Raja SG, Dreyfus GD. Current status of bosentan for treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Ann Card Anaesth 2008;11:6-14.
14Chaumais MC, Guignabert C, Savale L, Jaïs X, Boucly A, Montani D, et al. Clinical pharmacology of endothelin receptor antagonists used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2015;15:13-26.
15Ghofrani HA, Galiè N, Grimminger F, Grünig E, Humbert M, Jing ZC, et al. Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2013;369:330-40.
16Honorato Pérez J. Selexipag, a selective prostacyclin receptor agonist in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A pharmacology review. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2017;10:753-62.
17Ramakrishna G, Sprung J, Ravi BS, Chandrasekaran K, McGoon MD. Impact of pulmonary hypertension on the outcomes of noncardiac surgery: Predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1691-9.
18Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Fujita M, et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:487-92.
19Rodseth RN, Biccard BM, Chu R, Lurati Buse GA, Thabane L, Bakhai A, et al. Postoperative B-type natriuretic peptide for prediction of major cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: Systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2013;119:270-83.
20Raymond RJ, Hinderliter AL, Willis PW, Ralph D, Caldwell EJ, Williams W, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes in primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1214-9.
21Zayek M, Hamm C, O'Donnell K, Eyal F. Induced moderate hypothermia markedly exacerbates pulmonary hypertension and dysoxia in a neonatal piglet model of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Crit Care 2000;4 Suppl 1:P203.
22Abreu AR, Campos MA, Krieger BP. Pulmonary artery rupture induced by a pulmonary artery catheter: A case report and review of the literature. J Intensive Care Med 2004;19:291-6.
23Bossert T, Gummert JF, Bittner HB, Barten M, Walther T, Falk V, et al. Swan-ganz catheter-induced severe complications in cardiac surgery: Right ventricular perforation, knotting, and rupture of a pulmonary artery. J Card Surg 2006;21:292-5.
24Schulmeyer MC, Santelices E, Vega R, Schmied S. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography during noncardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006;20:768-71.
25Hofer CK, Zollinger A, Rak M, Matter-Ensner S, Klaghofer R, Pasch T, et al. Therapeutic impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography during noncardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2004;59:3-9.
26Meersch M, Schmidt C, Zarbock A. Echophysiology: The transesophageal echo probe as a noninvasive swan-ganz catheter. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2016;29:36-45.
27Chakravarthy M, Thimmangowda P, Krishnamurthy J, Nadiminti S, Jawali V. Thoracic epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients: A prospective audit of 2,113 cases. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005;19:44-8.
28Fox C, Kalarickal PL, Yarborough MJ, Jin JY. Perioperative management including new pharmacological vistas for patients with pulmonary hypertension for noncardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:467-72.
29Jenkins J, Lynn A, Edmonds J, Barker G. Effects of mechanical ventilation on cardiopulmonary function in children after open-heart surgery. Crit Care Med 1985;13:77-80.
30MacKnight B, Martinez EA, Simon BA. Anesthetic management of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008;12:91-6.
31Mertens E, Saldien V, Coppejans H, Bettens K, Vercauteren M. Target controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol for cesarean section in a patient with multivalvular disease and severe pulmonary hypertension. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2001;52:207-9.
32Rich GF, Roos CM, Anderson SM, Daugherty MO, Uncles DR. Direct effects of intravenous anesthetics on pulmonary vascular resistance in the isolated rat lung. Anesth Analg 1994;78:961-6.
33Rinne T, Zwissler B. Intraoperative anesthetic management in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Intensiv Notfallbeh 2004;29:4-13.
34Preckel B, Eberl S, Fräβdorf J, Hollmann MW. Management of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Anaesthesist 2012;61:574-87.
35Price LC, Wort SJ, Finney SJ, Marino PS, Brett SJ. Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction in adult critical care: Current and emerging options for management: A systematic literature review. Crit Care 2010;14:R169.
36Buck ML. Sildenafil for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in children. Pediatr Pharm 2004;10:2.
37Pilkington SA, Taboada D, Martinez G. Pulmonary hypertension and its management in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2015;70:56-70.
38Bédard E, Dimopoulos K, Gatzoulis MA. Has there been any progress made on pregnancy outcomes among women with pulmonary arterial hypertension? Eur Heart J 2009;30:256-65.
39Bassily-Marcus AM, Yuan C, Oropello J, Manasia A, Kohli-Seth R, Benjamin E, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy: Critical care management. Pulm Med 2012;2012:709407.
40Jaïs X, Olsson KM, Barbera JA, Blanco I, Torbicki A, Peacock A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Eur Respir J 2012;40:881-5.
41Rosengarten D, Blieden LC, Kramer MR. Pregnancy outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Eur Respir J 2012;40:1304-5.